[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140803022553.GC24826@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 22:25:53 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] e2fsck: use root dir for lost+found when really
desperate
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 11:11:59AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
>
> If we're totally unable to allocate a lost+found directory, ask the
> user if he would like to dump orphaned files in the root directory.
> Hopefully this enables the user to delete enough files so that a
> subsequent run of e2fsck will make more progress. Better to cram lost
> files in the rootdir than the current behavior, which is to fail at
> linking them in, thereby leaving them as lost files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Applied, although I changed:
> + printf("Delete some files and re-run e2fsck.\n\n");
to:
printf(_("Delete some files and re-run e2fsck.\n\n"));
for proper internationalization support. Usually, I like to run all
messages through problem.c, like this:
fix_problem(ctx, PR_3_PASS_HEADER, &pctx);
{ PR_3_PASS_HEADER,
N_("Pass 3: Checking @d connectivity\n"),
PROMPT_NONE, 0 },
and I may change this over at some point, but I'll leave it as a
printf for now.
Thanks!!
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists