[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140903160837.GC17066@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 18:08:37 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: don't call get_bh() before calling
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
On Tue 02-09-14 18:46:39, Ted Tso wrote:
> The __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() doesn't require an elevated
> b_count; indeed, until the jh structure gets released by the call to
> jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(), the bh's b_count is elevated by
> virtue of the existence of the jh structure.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Looks good so you can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Just we can do a bit more as I mentioned in my other email:
> @@ -359,8 +354,9 @@ restart2:
> * know that it has been written out and so we can
> * drop it from the list
> */
> - done = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
> __brelse(bh);
Here we don't need to grab bh reference unless we are going to call
wait_on_buffer(). Which moves get_bh / __brelse out of fast path.
> + if (__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh))
> + break;
> }
> out:
> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists