[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140906071320.GC27293@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 00:13:20 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@...mail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: journal_dev + metadata_csum issues
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:14:32AM -0400, TR Reardon wrote:
> 1) tune2fs hiccups when presented with journal device fs. Should it instead
> at least report "this is a journal device" rather than "invalid super block"?
Yes. e2fsck/debugfs seem to issue the 'unsupported features' complaint but
without the 'invalid superblock' wording.
> 2) no way to create journal_dev with metadata_csum. This would provide
> checksum for the fs superblock.
Not sure how useful this is since most of the SB is irrelevant here. But I
don't see any reason why we shouldn't let users turn it on.
> 3) dumpe2fs should still display journal flags for journal_dev; currently it
> fails to display journal flags.
Ick. Yes, that should work.
> 4) s_jnl_blocks in the superblock should be zeroed when removing a journal
> (ie ^has_journal) or when setting the journal to journal_dev. Currently, the
> legacy (now dead) block list is maintained. I'd argue that will invite
> misuse.
Seems like a reasonable precaution.
Now, does anyone know why ext4 reports a df size of 64ZB when I create an
external journal FS? :)
--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists