lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:02:13 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> Cc: fstests@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, wangxg.fnst@...fujitsu.com, eguan@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: speed up _require_ext4_bigalloc and _require_ext4_mkfs_bigalloc On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 07:50:00PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:06:08PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > We don't need to make a full-sized file system in order to test > > whether "mkfs.ext4 -O bigalloc" works. > > Why wouldn't you just use the "-n" option? If bigalloc is not > supported, that should still fail, right? Good point. We still need to make the file system for _require_ext4_bigalloc, but there's no need to create one for _require_ext4_mkfs_bigalloc. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists