[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140910214746.GJ10351@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:47:46 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@...mail.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dumpe2fs: only print 'unused inodes' once
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:38:43PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 12:47:46PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:32:56PM -0400, TR Reardon wrote:
> > > just a minor nit...and I don't think fixing this harms any existing tests.
> >
> > Running 'make check' will tell you.
> >
> > This also needs a Signed-off-by.
>
> It also might make more sense to move the checksum to after the inode
> table, i.e., instead of:
>
> Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767) [ITABLE_ZEROED]
> Checksum 0xe0c6
> Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-1
> Reserved GDT blocks at 2-512
> Block bitmap at 513 (+513), Inode bitmap at 529 (+529)
> Inode table at 545-1056 (+545)
> 24025 free blocks, 8181 free inodes, 2 directories, 8181 unused inodes
> Free blocks: 8743-32767
> Free inodes: 12-8192
>
> how about:
>
> Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767) [ITABLE_ZEROED]
> Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-1
> Reserved GDT blocks at 2-512
> Block bitmap at 513 (+513), Inode bitmap at 529 (+529)
> Inode table at 545-1056 (+545), Checksum 0xe0c6
But... 0xE0C6 is the group descriptor checksum. Since we report the bitmap
csum after mentioning them:
> Block bitmap at 2 (+2), csum 0xc759340d, Inode bitmap at 18 (+18), csum 0x941e2bba
It would make more sense to report the group checksum on the first line:
Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767) csum 0xe0c6 [ITABLE_ZEROED]
Unless it'll break peoples' scripts?
--D
> 24025 free blocks, 8181 free inodes, 2 directories, 8181 unused inodes
> Free blocks: 8743-32767
> Free inodes: 12-8192
>
> - Ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > --D
> > >
> > > +Reardon
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/misc/dumpe2fs.c b/misc/dumpe2fs.c
> > > index a1c5ba2..d30cf87 100644
> > > --- a/misc/dumpe2fs.c
> > > +++ b/misc/dumpe2fs.c
> > > @@ -205,8 +205,6 @@ static void list_desc (ext2_filsys fs)
> > > printf(_(" Checksum 0x%04x"), csum);
> > > if (csum != exp_csum)
> > > printf(_(" (EXPECTED 0x%04x)"), exp_csum);
> > > - printf(_(", unused inodes %u\n"),
> > > - ext2fs_bg_itable_unused(fs, i));
> > > }
> > > has_super = ((i==0) || super_blk);
> > > if (has_super) {
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists