lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BAY406-EAS150EB9E4098E2894ADA30B7FDB40@phx.gbl>
Date:	Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:54:39 -0400
From:	TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@...mail.com>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Reserved GDT inode: blocks vs extents

Hello all: there's probably a good reason for this, but I'm wondering why inode#7 (reserved GDT blocks) is always created with a block map rather than extent? 

 [see ext2fs_create_resize_inode()]

Would changing this to extent resolve problem of resize_inode and 64bit / >16TB filesystems?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ