linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds general codes to enforces project quota limits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140924171306.GA23874@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:13:06 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Li Xi <pkuelelixi@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	tytso@....edu, adilger@...ger.ca, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	dmonakhov@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds general codes to enforces project quota limits

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:10:20PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Yeah, I'm aware of that but I decided I won't bother Li Xi with that
> since it's independent issue and 8 bytes aren't that terrible.

For the inode of which we have so many instances it is.  Especially when
only one filesystem can make use of this new field.
 
> Personally
> I somewhat prefer what I did in
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg74927.html
> where we don't introduce additional method but rather a table with field
> offsets in superblock. If people agree with this, I can cook up a patch for
> quota relatively quickly.

There's an even better way.  We stopped calling the dquot_* functions
from generic code, so now the filesystem can simply pass in a pointer
to the dquot array.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html