[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:23:24 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
xfs@....sgi.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.de>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] jbd2: Optimize jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() a bit
When we discover written out buffer in transaction checkpoint list we
don't have to recheck validity of a transaction. Either this is the last
buffer in a transaction - and then we are done - or this isn't and then
we can just take another buffer from the checkpoint list without
dropping j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
index 993a187527f3..3722e2e53638 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
@@ -343,12 +343,15 @@ restart:
if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) && !result)
result = -EIO;
- get_bh(bh);
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "remove from checkpoint");
- __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
- spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
- __brelse(bh);
- goto retry;
+ if (__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)) {
+ /*
+ * This was the last buffer attached to the
+ * transaction. We are done.
+ */
+ goto out;
+ }
+ continue;
}
/*
* Important: we are about to write the buffer, and
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists