linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141018151738.GG30355@infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 08:17:38 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.de>,
	Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
	jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, tytso@....edu,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>   I don't see the 4-bytes per inode saving, what am I missing? Frankly, I
> don't see a difference in readability but since you and Al agree on that I
> concede to your taste :)

It's the removal of s_inode_fields that saves 4 bytes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html