[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mvAGe-N0e2rOsEe4DBT1tRM0Uv8rNQChmQY+d7dkLxR2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:16:30 -0600
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: xfstest generic/018 and ext4 defrag
I see an earlier thread about ext4 defrag problems causing this
failure on xfstest generic/018 running on ext4
generic/018 1s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see
/home/sfrench/xfstests/results//generic/018.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/018.out 2014-11-13 11:20:05.385406288 -0800
+++ /home/sfrench/xfstests/results//generic/018.out.bad 2014-11-13
12:33:19.317806287 -0800
@@ -10,10 +10,5 @@
After: 1
Write backwards sync, but contiguous - should defrag to 1 extent
Before: 10
-After: 1
-Write backwards sync leaving holes - defrag should do nothing
-Before: 16
-After: 16
...
but wasn't clear whether it was fixed upstream. It failed on two out
of three runs for me on most current ext4. My test is on most current
Ubuntu x86_64 (and with 3.18-rc3 kernel)
I couldn't find version info for e4defrag from the command line but
other ext4 tools are reasonably recent it seems as Ubuntu packages
them e.g. EXT2FS Library version 1.42.10, 18-May-2014
Is generic xfstest 18 still broken on ext4?
Also am curious about test generic/026
generic/026 [not run] ext4 does not define maximum ACL count
Is that expected?
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists