[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54646F8B.8040000@plexistor.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:44:59 +0200
From: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] ext4: add lazytime mount option
On 11/13/2014 08:41 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
<>
>
> I think this needs to a VFS level inode timestamp update option.
> The games ext4 is playing with reference counts inside .drop_inode are
> pretty nasty and could be avoided if this is implemented at the VFs
> level..
>
> I think that the "lazy time update" status should really be tracked
> in the inode->i_state field. Something like lazytime updates do not
> call ->update_inode, nor do they mark the inode dirty, but they do
> update the inode->i_[acm]time fields and set a TIMEDIRTY state flag.
>
> Then when the filesystem next logs or writes the inode it can
> log those fields and clear the TIMEDIRTY flag, or if iput_final()
> sees that flag it can call ->update_time directly to get the
> filesystem to run a transaction to update the timestamps before the
> inode is evicted from cache.
>
> That way the same update semantics can be easily implemented on all
> filesystems, and filesystems that already implement update_time
> should work without any modification at all...
>
+1 Like from Boaz. I think Dave is very much right!
> Cheers,
Indeed
Boaz
> Dave.
<>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists