[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127000136.GP10043@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:01:36 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: tytso@....edu
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 49/47] libext2fs: don't report garbage inodes with really
large inodes
If the inode size is large enough that there are fewer than two inodes
per block, don't report an inode checksum failure as a garbage inode
during the scan because the "more than half are broken" criteria that
we use to decide if a block of inodes is garbage doesn't really apply.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
---
lib/ext2fs/inode.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
index 4b3e14e..17e49d8 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/inode.c
@@ -424,6 +424,9 @@ static void check_inode_block_sanity(ext2_inode_scan scan, blk64_t num_blocks)
memset(block_status, 0, scan->inode_buffer_blocks);
inodes_per_block = EXT2_INODES_PER_BLOCK(scan->fs->super);
+ if (inodes_per_block < 2)
+ return;
+
#ifdef WORDS_BIGENDIAN
if (ext2fs_get_mem(EXT2_INODE_SIZE(scan->fs->super), &inode))
return;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists