[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141127152504.GA15839@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 07:25:04 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Filesystem Development List
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux btrfs Developers List <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v4 1/7] vfs: split update_time() into update_time() and
write_time()
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:34:29PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> But Ted changed XFS to copy timestamps to on-disk structure from the
> in-memory inode fields after VFS updated the timestamps. So the stamps
> should be coherent AFAICT, shouldn't they?
Not coherent enough. We need the XFS ilock to synchronize reading from
and writing to the time stamps. update_time() only has i_mutex, which
we can't take for the transaction commit path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists