[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548E59E2.3080001@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:47:46 +0800
From: alex chen <alex.chen@...wei.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: A doubt on journal_async_commit option
On 2014/12/12 22:54, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:03:32PM +0800, alex chen wrote:
>> This commit 0e3d2a6313(ext4: Fix async commit mode to be safe by using
>> a barrier) show that using journal_async_commit feature has a 50%
>> performance improvement. But I tested in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
>> 11 SP3(linux kernel 3.0.93) and Red Hat Enterprise linux 6.4(linux
>> kernel 2.6.32), the result show this feature has no performance
>> improvement.
>> My test command:
>> mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb
>> ./fs_mark -d /mnt/sdb/ -s 10240 -n 1000
>> umount
>>
>> mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb -o journal_async_commit
>> ./fs_mark -d /mnt/sdb/ -s 10240 -n 1000
>> umount
>>
>> My test result:
>> FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
>> 6 1000 10240 42.1 10671
>> vs.
>> -o journal_async_commit
>> FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
>> 6 1000 10240 63.9 10625
>
> Um, the files per second went up from 42.1 to 63.9 --- that's a 50%
> improvement, yes?
>
> - Ted
Yes, I understand it. Thank you!
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists