lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-89621-13602-nz5dmfjDdz@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:55:57 +0000
From:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 89621] EXT4-fs error (device dm-1):
 ext4_mb_release_inode_pa:3773: group 24089, free 34, pa_free 32

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89621

--- Comment #7 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> ---
OK, so vis-a-vis case #1, it looks like the fsck didn't take.

Dec  3 11:04:26 cedric kernel: [    1.440438] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounting ext3
file system using the ext4 subsystem
Dec  3 11:04:26 cedric kernel: [    1.468114] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted
filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
Dec  3 11:04:26 cedric kernel: [    6.139705] EXT4-fs (dm-0): re-mounted. Opts:
(null)
Dec  3 11:04:26 cedric kernel: [    6.311768] EXT4-fs (dm-0): re-mounted. Opts:
errors=remount-ro
Dec  3 11:09:11 cedric kernel: [  302.048065] EXT4-fs (dm-0): error count since
last fsck: 3
Dec  3 11:09:11 cedric kernel: [  302.048102] EXT4-fs (dm-0): initial error at
time 1417556618: ext4_mb_release_inode_pa:3773
Dec  3 11:09:11 cedric kernel: [  302.048105] EXT4-fs (dm-0): last error at
time 1417596801: ext4_remount:4853

I'm not exactly sure what time zone your system messages are in, but e2fsck
1.42.5 (I assume you're using e2fsprogs from debian stable?) will clear the
error stats, and time 1417596801 is:

% TZ=GMT date -d @1417596801
Wed Dec  3 08:53:21 GMT 2014

Either that, or maybe the raid system is acting up and writes aren't going to
both halves, or something weird like that?    Can you do me a favor and
configure a handful of VM's that ***don't*** use MD RAID, just so we can rule
out funny business on that score?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ