[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C06F01.7090604@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:31:13 -0600
From: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
To: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>, "jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix warning in ext4_da_update_reserve_space()
On 01/08/2015 02:48 PM, Josh Hunt wrote:
> Please add the patch below and referenced dependency (0e95c22) to stable
> 3.10.y. The original 7d73453 did not apply cleanly to my 3.10.y so I've
> backported it here. Its dependency can be cherry-picked.
>
> I've gotten approval to submit these to 3.10 stable from Jan and Ted, also
> cc'd.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=142070334408249&w=2
>
> Thanks
> Josh
>
> -----
>
> commit 7d7345322d60edb0fa49a64a89b31360f01d09cb upstream
>
> reaim workfile.dbase test easily triggers warning in
> ext4_da_update_reserve_space():
>
> EXT4-fs warning (device ram0): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:365:
> ino 12, allocated 1 with only 0 reserved metadata blocks (releasing 1
> blocks with reserved 9 data blocks)
>
> The problem is that (one of) tests creates file and then randomly writes
> to it with O_SYNC. That results in writing back pages of the file in
> random order so we create extents for written blocks say 0, 2, 4, 6, 8
> - this last allocation also allocates new block for extents. Then we
> writeout block 1 so we have extents 0-2, 4, 6, 8 and we release
> indirect extent block because extents fit in the inode again. Then we
> writeout block 10 and we need to allocate indirect extent block again
> which triggers the warning because we don't have the reservation
> anymore.
>
> Fix the problem by giving back freed metadata blocks resulting from
> extent merging into inode's reservation pool.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10.x: 0e95c22: quota: provide interface for readding allocated space into reserved space
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.10.x
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
I've just realized the patch dependency I referenced above, 0e95c22, is
incorrect. It should have been 1c8924eb106. Sorry for any confusion.
Let me know if I you'd like me to respin the patch with the proper hash
information.
Thanks
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists