linux-ext4 - [Bug 92271] Provide a way to really delete files, please

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bug-92271-13602-rS2dmH3FhI@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date:	Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:14:39 +0000
From:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 92271] Provide a way to really delete files, please

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92271

--- Comment #14 from Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> ---
The FS doesn't have to give a promise for the storage.

If the storage doesn't overwrite the same blocks (which it did for 25 years and
still does on most conventional HDs) and doesn't offer a way to really get rid
of stuff (like Secure Trim), then the storage can be blamed.

Using encryption is just a workaround. And what makes you believe that the used
encryption is secure? Or that the used encryption is still secure in some
years. Encryption often suffers under bugs in the implementation, bugs in the
algorithm itself and from Moore. Just think at all the "encrypted"
zip-archives. I a few years people might laught about the stuff used today to
encrypt.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html