[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <85D94901-4D36-45F3-A57C-0D6010DE18FA@dilger.ca>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:08:51 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
jaegeuk@...nel.org, mhalcrow@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] ext4: add ext4_mpage_readpages()
On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> This takes code from fs/mpage.c and optimizes it for ext4. Its
> primary reason is to allow us to more easily add encryption to ext4's
> read path in an efficient manner.
>
[snip]
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/readpage.c b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9ca4dfc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/fs/ext4/readpage.c
> + *
> + * This was originally taken from fs/mpage.c
> + *
> + * The intent is the ext4_mpage_readpages() function here is intended
> + * to replace mpage_readpages() in the general case, not just for
> + * encrypted files. It has some limitations (see below), where it
> + * will fall back to read_block_full_page(), but these limitations
> + * should never be hit when page_size != block_size.
Shouldn't this be "... should never be hit when page_size == block_size"?
Otherwise, we'd hit them almost all the time...
Cheers, Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists