[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150409202736.GA13705@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:27:36 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 23340 at fs/block_dev.c
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> Nope, I just got new servers to play with and decided to try xfstests.
>
> I can try bisection if it doesn't sound familiar, but since it's metal
> servers it'll take a while.
It's in the "dangerous" group, which may very well mean that it's
known to cause systems to crash. In general I tend to run either
"check -g quick" as a smoke test, or "check -g auto" with a variety of
different ext4 configurations. The former takes about 30 minuts, and
the latter (given my current list of test configs) takes a bit under
24 hours.
I tried manually running generic/019, and even though I have
CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST defined, /sys/kernel/debug/fail_make_request
isn't present, and so the test complains that I haven't compiled it
into my kernel --- even though /proc/config.gz confirms that it is
enabled.
Is there anything special I have to do to get generic/019 to run?
Thanks,
- Ted
P.S. I have provided for ext4 developers are preconfigured kvm test
image that makes it very easy to do tests without needing to use bare
metal; let me know if you're interested in getting a quick start to
our setup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists