| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 22:45:33 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: Dolev Raviv <draviv@...eaurora.org> Cc: "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: planning general storage capacity for y fs On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dolev Raviv <draviv@...eaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking for guidelines for planning storage capacity. I understand it > strongly depended on the usage type. > I want to know at what point storage fullness is effecting performance in a > standard read/write partition. Do different File Systems (UBIFS/EXT4) have > different full-free ratio? > What about read only fs? Can I plan less free space in such cases? > > I'll appreciate any input on this, for UBIFS specific and fs in general. Not sure if I got your question. You want to know how filesystems in general behave when they run out of free space? The general answer is that they need more effort to find free space. In case of UBIFS you also have to think of the garbage collector. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html At the end of the day you'll have to run benchmarks on your own to find out how a specific filesystem behaves on your workload... -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists