linux-ext4 - Re: [v14 3/4] ext4: adds FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR/FS_IOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bngulhsx.fsf@openvz.org>
Date:	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:45:34 +0300
From:	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To:	Li Xi <pkuelelixi@...il.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	"linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
	"viro\@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"hch\@infradead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [v14 3/4] ext4: adds FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR/FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR interface support

Li Xi <pkuelelixi@...il.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I tried hard to run xfstests on original linux-4.0. In order to do so,
> I skipped some of the tests which cause kernel crash. However, about
> ten tests were skipped. But the crash seems endless. I was using the
> latest xfstests from git repository. I guess there is some mismatch
> between the versions of XFS and xfstests that I used? Should I use
> some special version of xfstests or XFS? Please advise.
IMHO, the best version of the test is the one which cause a kernel crash.
So your have got the best one. But as far as Jan already mentioned this
is likely core mm/timer issue, not XFS specific one.
Google points me that code affected was changed here https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/26/14
Likely that you can trigger the crush w/o your patches. Is it correct?
You can try to fix original bug, or simply migrate patches to some
recent stable kernel version.

>
> Regards,
> Li Xi
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:45:40PM +0800, Li Xi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>>> >   Hi,
>>> >
>>> > On Wed 29-04-15 13:49:08, Li Xi wrote:
>>> >> Thanks for the advices. I tried to run latest xfstests again. However,
>>> >   Dave actually asked you to update 'xfsprogs' not xfstests. Not that
>>> > updating xfstests would be a wrong thing to do but you still need to update
>>> > xfsprogs for xfstests to be able to run some tests. But that's unrelated to
>>> > the oops you reported below.
>>> Understood. I updated both xfstests and xfsprogs to the latest version from git
>>> repository. However, I didn't update xfsdump because of a build failure caused
>>> by missing definitons of 'min' and 'max'
>>
>> The /usr/include/xfs header files are stale. Upgrade your
>> xfslibs-dev package, if there is one for your distro.
>>
>> And, please, report package build failures to the appropriate list,
>> next time, rather than ignoring them?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>> --
>> Dave Chinner
>> david@...morbit.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (473 bytes)