lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55726ECE.70101@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 11:53:50 +0800 From: Wen Congyang <ghostwcy@...il.com> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com> CC: David Weber <wb@...zinger.de>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org, wenqing.lz@...bao.com Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re-2: Strange problems with lseek in qemu-img map At 2015/6/5 23:14, Lukáš Czerner Wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:05:15 +0100 >> From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com> >> To: David Weber <wb@...zinger.de> >> Cc: qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, >> Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, wency@...fujitsu.com >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re-2: Strange problems with lseek in qemu-img map >> >> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 03:09:40PM +0000, David Weber wrote: >>>>> I then startet a fedora 22 live system and I saw the same problem. It >>>>> happens >>>>> on both the ramdisk and a ext4 filesystem. >>>> >>>> "it" == qemu-img map hangs or takes a very long time? >>> I never waited for it to complete but I guess it just takes very long. >>> >>>> >>>> Can you post a shell script that reproduces this with a ramdisk? That >>>> seems like the easiest way to get people debugging it. >>> >>> You can use the following commands. >>> >>> mkfs.ext4 /dev/ram0 >>> mkdir -p /mnt/tmp >>> mount /dev/ram0 /mnt/tmp >>> cd /mnt/tmp >>> qemu-img create test 500G >>> time qemu-img map test >>> >>> This takes foreover on all my systems. >> >> I experience the same thing on Linux 4.1.0-rc5 with ext4 (4 KB file >> system block size, 512B device sector size). >> >> The lseek() calls take *seconds* to complete on a completely empty >> (sparse) 500G file. >> >> Here is the perf-top(1) output: >> >> 34.08% [kernel] [k] _raw_read_lock >> 21.11% [kernel] [k] ext4_es_lookup_extent >> 20.67% [kernel] [k] ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range >> 8.68% [kernel] [k] ext4_map_blocks >> 4.99% [kernel] [k] ext4_llseek >> 1.90% [kernel] [k] rb_next >> 0.14% [kernel] [k] __fget >> >> Yikes! >> >> The syscall causing this is just: >> >> lseek(7, 0, SEEK_DATA) >> >> Lukas: I've CCed you because you have helped with ext4 issues in the >> past. Not sure if you have time or if this is your area. >> >> Stefan > > Hi, > > this is definitely an issue with extent status tree and I have not seen > it before. I'll look at it first thing next week, but meanwhile I'll > add Zheng Liu who is the author of the extent status tree so he > might be able to help you. It is an known bug, and Dmitry Monakhov tried to fix it: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=14516bb7bb6ffbd49f35389f9ece3b2045ba5815 But this patch introduced another problem, and have been reverted. Thanks Wen Congyang > > Regards, > -Lukas > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists