linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race between truncate and __ext4_journalled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150615170325.GA2381@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:03:25 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	enwlinux@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race between truncate and
 __ext4_journalled_writepage()

On Mon 15-06-15 09:06:11, Ted Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 02:33:52PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   Yeah, that's nasty. Thanks for debugging this! However I think your fix
> > reintroduces the original deadlock issues. do_journal_get_write_access()
> > can end up blocking waiting for jbd2 thread to finish a commit while jbd2
> > thread may be blocked waiting for the page to be unlocked.
> > 
> > After some thought I don't think the deadlock is real since
> > do_journal_get_write_access() will currently only block if a buffer is
> > under writeout to the journal and at that point we don't wait for page
> > locks anymore. Also ext4_write_begin() does the same in data=journal mode
> > and we haven't observed deadlocks so far. But still things look really
> > fragile here.
> 
> The reason why there are no deadlocks is the writeback in the commit
> thread happens when the inode gets written back --- but that only
> happens for data=ordered inodes, not data=journalled mode.  I was a
> little worried about what might happen when after the 'j' chattr
> attribute gets set on an inode, and the inode was still on the ordered
> flush list.
> 
> Hmm... I think we could also maybe fix this by having
> ext4_change_inode_journal_flag() force a journal commit before setting
> the JOURNAL_DATA flag.  If we did that, we could just avoid dropping
> the page_lock in __ext4_journalled_writepage() altogether.
> 
> What do you think?
  I think that fully switching lock ordering for data=journal mode back to
page lock -> transaction start (which is what you effectively do when you
never drop page lock in ->writepage) is rather error prone. We'd have to be
careful to avoid lock inversion also for places like ->write_begin,
->releasepage, ->invalidatepage etc. For example ext4_write_begin() will
currently call lock_page() with transaction started which could deadlock
against journalled writepage you suggest. So effectively we'd have to
completely separate aops for data=journal mode. Doable but I'm not sure
it's worth it.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html