linux-ext4 - Re: Lockup in wait_transaction_locked under memory pressure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55911C25.9090700@kyup.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:21:25 +0300
From:	Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Marian Marinov <mm@...com>
Subject: Re: Lockup in wait_transaction_locked under memory pressure



On 06/29/2015 12:38 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 29-06-15 12:23:16, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/29/2015 12:16 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Mon 29-06-15 12:07:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/29/2015 11:32 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>> On Thu 25-06-15 18:27:10, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/25/2015 06:18 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu 25-06-15 17:34:22, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 06/25/2015 05:05 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu 25-06-15 16:49:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>> How would you advise to rectify such situation?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I've said. Check the oom victim traces and see if it is holding any
>>>>>>>>> of those locks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As mentioned previously all OOM traces are identical to the one I've
>>>>>>>> sent - OOM being called form the page fault path.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> By identical you mean that all of them kill the same task? Or just that
>>>>>>> the path is same (which wouldn't be surprising as this is the only path
>>>>>>> which triggers memcg oom killer)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The code path is the same, the tasks being killed are different
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the OOM killer triggered only for a singe memcg or others misbehave
>>>>> as well?
>>>>
>>>> Generally OOM would be triggered for whichever memcg runs out of
>>>> resources but so far I've only observed that the D state issue happens
>>>> in a single containers.
>>>
>>> It is not clear whether it is the OOM memcg which has tasks in the D
>>> state. Anyway I think it all smells like one memcg is throttling others
>>> on another shared resource - journal in your case.
>>
>> Be that as it may, how do I find which cgroup is the culprit?
> 
> Ted has already described that. You have to check all the running tasks
> and try to find which of them is doing the operation which blocks
> others. Transaction commit sounds like the first one to check.

One other, fairly crucial detail - each and every container is on a
separate block device, meaning the journals for different block devices
is not being shared, since the journal is per-block device. I guess this
means that whatever is happening is more or less constrained to the
block device and thus the possibility that different memcg competing for
the journal can be eliminated?

> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html