[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150701142157.GB6287@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:21:57 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Marian Marinov <mm@...com>
Subject: Re: Lockup in wait_transaction_locked under memory pressure
On Wed 01-07-15 07:13:55, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
[...]
> Perhaps we need to make the documentation a bit more explicit?
> All which is stated in include/slab.h:
>
> * %GFP_NOIO - Do not do any I/O at all while trying to get memory.
> *
> * %GFP_NOFS - Do not make any fs calls while trying to get memory.
>
> I thought this was obvious, but these flags are used by code which in
> the I/O or FS paths, and so it's always possible that they are trying
> to write back the page which you decide to blocking on when trying to
> do the memory allocation, at which point, *boom*, deadlock.
>
> So it's just not "do not make any FS or I/O calls", but also "the mm
> layer must not not wait for any FS or I/O operations from completing,
> since the operation you block on might be the one they were in the
> middle of trying to complete --- or they may be holding a lock at the
> time when they were trying to do a memory allocation which blocks the
> I/O or FS operation from completing".
Sure any refinement here would be more than welcome.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists