linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs: Remove ext3 filesystem driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150728215004.GA15904@untroubled.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:50:04 -0600
From:	Bruce Guenter <bruce@...roubled.org>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs: Remove ext3 filesystem driver

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:35:09PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-07-15 12:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Also, what's the status of ext4's data=journal?  It's the hardest ext3
> > mode for the rest of the kernel to support and I suspect hardly anyone
> > uses it.
> I use it, as do some other people I know, but only for stuff that pretty 
> much needs to be 100% guaranteed to be consistent after a power failure. 
>   It is _very_ slow, but it does work correctly based on my recent 
> experience.

It is also a benefit for workloads that are heavy on sync writes to
(relatively) small files, such as mail servers. At least, it used to be
considerably faster than data=ordered the last time I benchmarked it.

-- 
Bruce Guenter <bruce@...roubled.org>                http://untroubled.org/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)