[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bug-101011-13602-HVW753rY8L@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:39:43 +0000
From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 101011] Kernel Oops when disconnecting a mounted ext4 usb stick
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #8 from Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> ---
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:02:14AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
>
> I can also confirm that this bug is present in latest stable kernel (4.1.5) and
> reverting commit from comment 6 seems to fix it.
Christoph,
I've since gotten two reports from users that reverting your commit:
"08439fec266c3: ext4: remove block_device_ejected" fixes a crash when
a USB stick is yanked from their system. Looking at the reported
stack dump, it looks like the crash is happening in
account_page_dirtied() when it updates some bdi-specific statistics.
I haven't been paying attention to the recent changes in how bdi gets
torn down after the device gets removed, and in fact finding the
recent changes wasn't obvioius enough after doing a brief search, but
it seems to me that if reverting this patch is making any kind of
differences, then the assertion in the commit description:
bdi->dev now never goes away, so this function became useless.
it implies that bdi->dev *does* become NULL, and checking for this is
useful. In any case, I don't see any harm in reverting this commit;
what do you think?
Thanks,
- Ted
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists