[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150815153713.GB22485@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 11:37:13 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2 v2] ext4: simplify some code in read_mmp_block()
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:03:46AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > My static check complains because we have:
> >
> > if (!*bh)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > if (*bh) {
> >
> > The second check is unnecessary.
> >
> > I've simplified this code by moving the "if (!*bh)" checks around. Also
> > Andreas Dilger says we should probably print a warning if sb_getblk()
> > fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Applied, thanks. I've changed the patch slightly to also print a
warning if the MMP magic number and/or checksum for the MMP block
doesn't check out, and to print the error code to disambiguate between
the various failure cases.
One thing, from looking at the function --- it looks like it might be
a good idea if we were to move the call to clear_buffer_uptodate() to
*after* the sb_getblk() call, no?
Otherwise we don't reread the MMP block if it is already in the cache,
and it is the first time read_mmp_block() is called in a function in
fs/ext4/mmp.c.....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists