lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:28:38 -0300
From:	Albino B Neto <>
To:	Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:	"Darrick J. Wong" <>,
	Mel Gorman <>,
	Jan Kara <>, LKML <>,
	"" <>,
	linux-fsdevel <>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes

2015-09-02 20:47 GMT-03:00 Linus Torvalds <>:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong
> <> wrote:
>> Yes, that would be a bug.
> So the thing I'm happy to see is that the ext4 developers seem to
> unanimously agree that maintaining ext3 compatibility is part of their
> job, and nobody seems to be arguing for keeping ext3 around. As long
> as any possible regressions from ext3 removal have a clear "yup, it's
> on us" from the ext4 people,  I don't mind removing it. I was
> expecting ext4 people to not be thrilled about supporting possible
> legacy cases.


The future of ext4 ? Are you (developers) write other file system ?

Albino B Neto
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists