lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMu38xLf-b_re4vCFuZP3i6sR5gVZE25Wak4+s1KNd6heSST6A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:28:38 -0300 From: Albino B Neto <bino@...eup.net> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Ext3 removal, quota & udf fixes 2015-09-02 20:47 GMT-03:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong > <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote: >> Yes, that would be a bug. > > So the thing I'm happy to see is that the ext4 developers seem to > unanimously agree that maintaining ext3 compatibility is part of their > job, and nobody seems to be arguing for keeping ext3 around. As long > as any possible regressions from ext3 removal have a clear "yup, it's > on us" from the ext4 people, I don't mind removing it. I was > expecting ext4 people to not be thrilled about supporting possible > legacy cases. Good. The future of ext4 ? Are you (developers) write other file system ? -- Albino B Neto www.bino.us "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists