[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU7sR2zN-K3un74wCv+1NPnrqJ=LYiWo+YQ_2X0kopyoTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:41:30 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/48] ext4: Add richacl feature flag
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
<ahferroin7@...il.com> wrote:
> I would like to re-iterate, on both XFS and ext4, I _really_ think this
> should be a ro_compat flag, and not an incompat one. If a person has the
> ability to mount the FS (even if it's a read-only mount), then they by
> definition have read access to the file or partition that the filesystem is
> contained in, which means that any ACL's stored on the filesystem are
> functionally irrelevant,
It is unfortunately not safe to make such a file system accessible to
other users, so the feature is not strictly read-only compatible.
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists