linux-ext4 - Refreshed rootfs.img for kvm-xfstests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151025212646.GA25680@thunk.org>
Date:	Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:26:46 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Refreshed rootfs.img for kvm-xfstests

Hi, I've uploaded an updated rootfs.img at:

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests

It includes the xfstests-dev upstream version 0e6ead559169 (Updated
from Oct. 14th) and some configuration changes to minimize some test
failure noise.  The config files are commented with the known
failures, for example:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git/tree/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/conf/encrypt.exclude

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git/tree/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/conf/data_journal_noleak

I am currently getting the following results:

BEGIN TEST 4k: Ext4 4k block Sun Oct 25 07:29:52 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/304
BEGIN TEST 1k: Ext4 1k block Sun Oct 25 08:12:58 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/304 generic/018
BEGIN TEST ext3: Ext4 4k block emulating ext3 Sun Oct 25 09:01:21 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/301 ext4/302 ext4/303 ext4/304 generic/018
BEGIN TEST encrypt: Ext4 encryption Sun Oct 25 09:44:13 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/301 ext4/303 ext4/304
BEGIN TEST nojournal: Ext4 4k block w/ no journal Sun Oct 25 10:20:57 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/301 ext4/304
BEGIN TEST ext3conv: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc and no flex_bg Sun Oct 25 11:01:06 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/304
BEGIN TEST dioread_nolock: Ext4 4k block w/dioread_nolock Sun Oct 25 11:41:36 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/001 ext4/304 ext4/308 generic/324
BEGIN TEST data_journal_noleak: Ext4 4k block w/data=journal Sun Oct 25 12:24:57 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/271 ext4/301 ext4/302 ext4/303 ext4/304 ext4/308 generic/018
BEGIN TEST inline: Ext4 4k block w/inline Sun Oct 25 13:16:58 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/304
BEGIN TEST bigalloc: Ext4 4k block w/bigalloc Sun Oct 25 14:00:23 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/004 generic/018 generic/204 generic/219 generic/235 generic/273
BEGIN TEST bigalloc_1k: Ext4 1k block w/bigalloc Sun Oct 25 14:46:29 EDT 2015
Failures: ext4/004 generic/018 generic/204 generic/235

(The ext4/30[1234] failures we only recently added back the these
tests that had been previously marked as dangerous and not in the auto
group.  ext4/304 is pretty clearly a buggy test as near as I can tell.
I haven't had a chance to rule out the others.  generic/018 is an
expected failures due to how we handle defrag; I should just add that
to all.exclude.  I need to take a closer look at some of the other
failures to understand what is going on.)

						- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html