[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jnNNFAp_L5BFbP4K6vNhffELSS7g0aekhGnCadsBCfnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:52:59 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>
Subject: Re: dax pmd fault handler never returns to userspace
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When running the nvml library's test suite against an ext4 file system
> mounted with -o dax, I ran into an issue where many of the tests would
> simply timeout. The problem appears to be that the pmd fault handler
> never returns to userspace (the application is doing a memcpy of 512
> bytes into pmem). Here's the 'perf report -g' output:
>
> - 88.30% 0.01% blk_non_zero.st libc-2.17.so [.] __memmove_ssse3_back
> - 88.30% __memmove_ssse3_back
> - 66.63% page_fault
> - 66.47% do_page_fault
> - 66.16% __do_page_fault
> - 63.38% handle_mm_fault
> - 61.15% ext4_dax_pmd_fault
> - 45.04% __dax_pmd_fault
> - 37.05% vmf_insert_pfn_pmd
> - track_pfn_insert
> - 35.58% lookup_memtype
> - 33.80% pat_pagerange_is_ram
> - 33.40% walk_system_ram_range
> - 31.63% find_next_iomem_res
> 21.78% strcmp
>
> And here's 'perf top':
>
> Samples: 2M of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 56080150519
> Overhead Shared Object Symbol
> 22.55% [kernel] [k] strcmp
> 20.33% [unknown] [k] 0x00007f9f549ef3f3
> 10.01% [kernel] [k] native_irq_return_iret
> 9.54% [kernel] [k] find_next_iomem_res
> 3.00% [jbd2] [k] start_this_handle
>
> This is easily reproduced by doing the following:
>
> git clone https://github.com/pmem/nvml.git
> cd nvml
> make
> make test
> cd src/test/blk_non_zero
> ./blk_non_zero.static-nondebug 512 /path/to/ext4/dax/fs/testfile1 c 1073741824 w:0
>
> I also ran the test suite against xfs, and the problem is not present
> there. However, I did not verify that the xfs tests were getting pmd
> faults.
>
> I'm happy to help diagnose the problem further, if necessary.
Sysrq-t or sysrq-w dump? Also do you have the locking fix from Yigal?
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-November/002842.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists