linux-ext4 - Re: dax pmd fault handler never returns to userspace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151119003624.GA26287@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:36:24 -0700
From:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dax pmd fault handler never returns to userspace

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:04:41PM -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 13:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> > > I am seeing a similar/same problem in my test.  I think the problem is that
> > > in
> > > case of a WP fault, wp_huge_pmd() -> __dax_pmd_fault() ->
> > > vmf_insert_pfn_pmd(),
> > > which is a no-op since the PMD is mapped already.  We need WP handling for
> > > this
> > > PMD map.
> > > 
> > > If it helps, I have attached change for follow_trans_huge_pmd().  I have not
> > > tested much, though.
> > 
> > Interesting, I didn't get this far because my tests were crashing the
> > kernel.  I'll add this case the pmd fault test in ndctl.
> 
> I hit this one with mmap(MAP_POPULATE).  With this change, I then hit the WP
> fault loop when writing to the range.

Here's a fix - please let me know if this seems incomplete or incorrect for
some reason.

-- >8 --
>From 02aa9f37d7ec9c0c38413f7e304b2577eb9f974a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:15:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm: Allow DAX PMD mappings to become writeable

Prior to this change DAX PMD mappings that were made read-only were never able
to be made writable again.  This is because the code in insert_pfn_pmd() that
calls pmd_mkdirty() and pmd_mkwrite() would skip these calls if the PMD
already existed in the page table.

Instead, if we are doing a write always mark the PMD entry as dirty and
writeable.  Without this code we can get into a condition where we mark the
PMD as read-only, and then on a subsequent write fault we get into an infinite
loop of PMD faults where we try unsuccessfully to make the PMD writeable.

Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bbac913..1b3df56 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -877,15 +877,13 @@ static void insert_pfn_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 
 	ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
-	if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
-		entry = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
-		if (write) {
-			entry = pmd_mkyoung(pmd_mkdirty(entry));
-			entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(entry, vma);
-		}
-		set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, entry);
-		update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, addr, pmd);
+	entry = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
+	if (write) {
+		entry = pmd_mkyoung(pmd_mkdirty(entry));
+		entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(entry, vma);
 	}
+	set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmd, entry);
+	update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, addr, pmd);
 	spin_unlock(ptl);
 }
 
-- 
2.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html