[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160107184403.GB28338@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:44:03 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] e2fsck: fix problem report typo
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:31:18PM -0500, Eric Whitney wrote:
> Remove the stray left parenthesis. Observed while testing bigalloc_1k
> filesystems with shared/298 on 32 bit ARM running 4.3 kernels.
>
> v2: Modify the expect files for the relevant regression tests.
Looks ok now,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
--D
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@...il.com>
> ---
> e2fsck/problem.c | 2 +-
> tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 | 2 +-
> tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c
> index a7da94d..7bd660d 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/problem.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/problem.c
> @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = {
>
> /* Inode extent tree could be narrower */
> { PR_1E_CAN_NARROW_EXTENT_TREE,
> - N_("@i %i @x tree (at (level %b) could be narrower. "),
> + N_("@i %i @x tree (at level %b) could be narrower. "),
> PROMPT_FIX, PR_NO_OK | PR_PREEN_NO | PR_PREEN_OK },
>
> /* Pass 2 errors */
> diff --git a/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 b/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1
> index 1159f24..a359c99 100644
> --- a/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1
> +++ b/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Level Entries Logical Physical Length Flags
> 1/ 1 2/ 3 19 - 19 104 - 104 1
> 1/ 1 3/ 3 21 - 21 105 - 105 1
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> -Inode 12 extent tree (at (level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes
> +Inode 12 extent tree (at level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes
>
> Pass 1E: Optimizing extent trees
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> diff --git a/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 b/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1
> index 59e1952..056689f 100644
> --- a/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1
> +++ b/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Inode 12, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> (logical block 15, physical block 200, len 30)
> Clear? yes
>
> -Inode 12 extent tree (at (level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes
> +Inode 12 extent tree (at level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes
>
> Inode 12, i_blocks is 154, should be 94. Fix? yes
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists