linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] dax: fix NULL pointer dereference in __dax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160107231000.GO21461@dastard>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:10:00 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] dax: fix NULL pointer dereference in __dax_dbg()

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 06-01-16 11:14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ross Zwisler
> > <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > __dax_dbg() currently assumes that bh->b_bdev is non-NULL, passing it into
> > > bdevname() where is is dereferenced.  This assumption isn't always true -
> > > when called for reads of holes, ext4_dax_mmap_get_block() returns a buffer
> > > head where bh->b_bdev is never set.  I hit this BUG while testing the DAX
> > > PMD fault path.
> > >
> > > Instead, verify that we have a valid bh->b_bdev, else just say "unknown"
> > > for the block device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/dax.c | 7 ++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> > > index 7af8797..03cc4a3 100644
> > > --- a/fs/dax.c
> > > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> > > @@ -563,7 +563,12 @@ static void __dax_dbg(struct buffer_head *bh, unsigned long address,
> > >  {
> > >         if (bh) {
> > >                 char bname[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> > > -               bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> > > +
> > > +               if (bh->b_bdev)
> > > +                       bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> > > +               else
> > > +                       snprintf(bname, BDEVNAME_SIZE, "unknown");
> > > +
> > >                 pr_debug("%s: %s addr: %lx dev %s state %lx start %lld "
> > >                         "length %zd fallback: %s\n", fn, current->comm,
> > >                         address, bname, bh->b_state, (u64)bh->b_blocknr,
> > 
> > I'm assuming there's no danger of a such a buffer_head ever being used
> > for the bdev parameter to dax_map_atomic()?  Shouldn't we also/instead
> > go fix ext4 to not send partially filled buffer_heads?
> 
> No. The real problem is a long-standing abuse of struct buffer_head to be
> used for passing block mapping information (it's on my todo list to remove
> that at least from DAX code and use cleaner block mapping interface but
> first I want basic DAX functionality to settle down to avoid unnecessary
> conflicts). Filesystem is not supposed to touch bh->b_bdev.

That has not been true for a long, long time. e.g. XFS always
rewrites bh->b_bdev in get_blocks because the file may not reside on
the primary block device of the filesystem. i.e.:

        /*
         * If this is a realtime file, data may be on a different device.
         * to that pointed to from the buffer_head b_bdev currently.
         */
        bh_result->b_bdev = xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(inode);

> If you need
> that filled in, set it yourself in before passing bh to the block mapping
> function.

That may be true, but we cannot assume that the bdev coming back
out of get_block is the same one that was passed in.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html