linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] dax: fix conversion of holes to PMDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160112094451.GS6262@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:44:51 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, x86@...nel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] dax: fix conversion of holes to PMDs

On Thu 07-01-16 22:27:52, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> When we get a DAX PMD fault for a write it is possible that there could be
> some number of 4k zero pages already present for the same range that were
> inserted to service reads from a hole.  These 4k zero pages need to be
> unmapped from the VMAs and removed from the struct address_space radix tree
> before the real DAX PMD entry can be inserted.
> 
> For PTE faults this same use case also exists and is handled by a
> combination of unmap_mapping_range() to unmap the VMAs and
> delete_from_page_cache() to remove the page from the address_space radix
> tree.
> 
> For PMD faults we do have a call to unmap_mapping_range() (protected by a
> buffer_new() check), but nothing clears out the radix tree entry.  The
> buffer_new() check is also incorrect as the current ext4 and XFS filesystem
> code will never return a buffer_head with BH_New set, even when allocating
> new blocks over a hole.  Instead the filesystem will zero the blocks
> manually and return a buffer_head with only BH_Mapped set.
> 
> Fix this situation by removing the buffer_new() check and adding a call to
> truncate_inode_pages_range() to clear out the radix tree entries before we
> insert the DAX PMD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

Just two nits below. Nothing serious so you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

> ---
>  fs/dax.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 513bba5..5b84a46 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ int __dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  	bool write = flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
>  	struct block_device *bdev;
>  	pgoff_t size, pgoff;
> +	loff_t lstart, lend;
>  	sector_t block;
>  	int result = 0;
>  
> @@ -643,15 +644,13 @@ int __dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>  		goto fallback;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If we allocated new storage, make sure no process has any
> -	 * zero pages covering this hole
> -	 */
> -	if (buffer_new(&bh)) {
> -		i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> -		unmap_mapping_range(mapping, pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT, PMD_SIZE, 0);
> -		i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
> -	}
> +	/* make sure no process has any zero pages covering this hole */
> +	lstart = pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	lend = lstart + PMD_SIZE - 1; /* inclusive */
> +	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);

Just a nit but is there reason why we grab i_mmap_lock_read(mapping) only
to release it a few lines below? The bh checks inside the locked region
don't seem to rely on i_mmap_lock...

> +	unmap_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, PMD_SIZE, 0);
> +	truncate_inode_pages_range(mapping, lstart, lend);

These two calls can be shortened as:

truncate_pagecache_range(inode, lstart, lend);


								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html