lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1ACAFB33-9F89-4718-99F4-CB0EE7206466@dilger.ca>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 14:50:48 -0700
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	Lokesh Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] EXT4: optimizing group search for inode allocation

On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Lokesh Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:12:20 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH v5] ext4: optimizing group serch for inode allocation
> 
> Added a check at the start of group search loop to
> avoid looping unecessarily in case of empty group.
> This also allow group search to jump directly to
> "found_flex_bg" with "stats" and "group" already set,
> so there is no need to go through the extra steps of
> setting "best_desc" , "best_group" and then break
> out of the loop just to set "stats" and "group" again.

This looks very good, just one minor potential issue below.

> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ialloc.c |   10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> index 1b8024d..d2835cc 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,12 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>             (ext4_test_inode_flag(parent, EXT4_INODE_TOPDIR)))) {
>                int best_ndir = inodes_per_group;
>                int ret = -1;
> +               /* Maximum usable blocks per group as some blocks are used
> +                * for inode tables and allocation bitmaps */
> +               unsigned int max_blocks_per_flex =

This should be an unsigned long long or __u64, since the max_blocks_per_flex
calculation may overflow a 32-bit value on filesystems with larger block_size
and a large value for flex_size (larger than 2^13 for a 64KB blocksize).

The "stats.free_clusters" is already a __u64 for this reason.

> +                       ((sbi->s_blocks_per_group -
> +                         (sbi->s_itb_per_group +  2)) *
> +                        flex_size) >>  sbi->s_cluster_bits;
> 
>                if (qstr) {
>                        hinfo.hash_version = DX_HASH_HALF_MD4;
> @@ -489,6 +495,10 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>                for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
>                        g = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
>                        get_orlov_stats(sb, g, flex_size, &stats);
> +                       /* can't get better group than empty group */
> +                       if (max_blocks_per_flex == stats.free_clusters &&
> +                           (inodes_per_group * flex_size) == stats.free_inodes)
> +                               goto found_flex_bg;
>                        if (!stats.free_inodes)
>                                continue;
>                        if (stats.used_dirs >= best_ndir)
> --
> 1.7.1
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:13:46PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Lokesh Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> you are right flex groups cannot be completely empty as some
>>> blocks are used for inode table and allocation bitmaps. I
>>> missed that point. I have corrected that. Also I have tested
>>> and validated this patch by putting some traces it works!
>> 
>> Good news.  Thanks for updating the patch and testing it.
>> More comments below.
>> 
>>> Here are corresponding logs:
>>> commands:
>>> =========
>>> mkfs.ext4 -g 10000 -G 2 /dev/sdc
>>> mount -t ext4  /dev/sdc /mnt/test_ext4/
>>> cd /mnt/test_ext4
>>> mkdir 1
>>> cd 1
>>> 
>>> logs:
>>> =====
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792939] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792939] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19264]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792939] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792939] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4853]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792950] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792950] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19481]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792950] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792950] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792958] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792958] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19481]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792958] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792958] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792965] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792965] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19481]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792965] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792965] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792972] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792972] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19481]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792972] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792972] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4864]
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792979] max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group     =  [19692]<<<<<<<<<<<
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792979] stats.free_clusters                  =  [19692]<<<<<<<<<<<
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792979] Inodes_per_flex_group                =  [4864]<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792979] stats.free_inodes                    =  [4864]<<<<<<<<<<<<
>>> Jan  7 03:36:45 root kernel: [   64.792985] found_flex_bg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>condition satisfied
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [Patch v4]:
>>> ==========
>>> From: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 05:12:20 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: optimizing group serch for inode allocation
>>> 
>>> Added a check at the start of group search loop to
>>> avoid looping unecessarily in case of empty group.
>>> This also allow group search to jump directly to
>>> "found_flex_bg" with "stats" and "group" already set,
>>> so there is no need to go through the extra steps of
>>> setting "best_desc" , "best_group" and then break
>>> out of the loop just to set "stats" and "group" again.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/ext4/ext4.h   |    2 ++
>>> fs/ext4/ialloc.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>>> index cc7ca4e..fc48f9a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>>> @@ -326,6 +326,8 @@ struct flex_groups {
>>> #define        EXT4_MAX_DESC_SIZE              EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE
>>> #define EXT4_DESC_SIZE(s)              (EXT4_SB(s)->s_desc_size)
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +# define EXT4_INODE_TABLE_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(s)  (EXT4_SB(s)->s_itb_per_group)
>>> +# define EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_CLUSTER(s)    (EXT4_SB(s)->s_cluster_ratio)
>> 
>> I don't think there is much value to these macros.  They aren't much
>> shorter than the actual variable access, and they don't provide any
>> improved clarity for the reader.
>> 
>> I think they were introduced many years ago so that this header could
>> be shared between the kernel and e2fsprogs, but that is no longer true
>> so I don't think there is a need to add new ones.
>> 
>> Ted, any opinion on this?
>> 
>>> # define EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(s)      (EXT4_SB(s)->s_blocks_per_group)
>>> # define EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(s)    (EXT4_SB(s)->s_clusters_per_group)
>>> # define EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(s)                (EXT4_SB(s)->s_desc_per_block)
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>> index 1b8024d..dc66ad8 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>> @@ -463,7 +463,6 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>                       sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
>>>               parent_group >>= sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
>>>       }
>>> -
>>>       freei = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
>>>       avefreei = freei / ngroups;
>> 
>> Not sure why this line is being deleted?
>> 
>>> @@ -477,7 +476,20 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>            (ext4_test_inode_flag(parent, EXT4_INODE_TOPDIR)))) {
>>>               int best_ndir = inodes_per_group;
>>>               int ret = -1;
>>> -
>>> +               /* blocks used for inode table and allocation bitmaps */
>>> +               unsigned int max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group;
>> 
>> This could be shorter and still clear, like "max_blocks_per_flex".
>> 
>>> +               unsigned int blocks_per_group = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
>>> +               unsigned int inode_table_blocks_per_group = \
>>> +                               EXT4_INODE_TABLE_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb);
>>> +               /* Number of blocks per cluster */
>>> +               unsigned int cluster_ratio = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_CLUSTER(sb);
>> 
>> There also isn't much value to making local variables that hold these
>> same values again.  It increases stack space for little benefit.  They
>> are only accessed once anyway.
>> 
>>> +               unsigned int inodes_per_flex_group = inodes_per_group * \
>>> +                                                       flex_size;
>>> +               max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group = \
>>> +                                       ((blocks_per_group*flex_size) - \
>> 
>> Spaces around that '*'.
>> 
>>> +                                       (inode_table_blocks_per_group * \
>>> +                                       flex_size + 2 * flex_size)) / \
>> 
>> This is C and not a CPP macro, so no need for linefeed escapes.
>> 
>>> +                                       cluster_ratio;
>> 
>> This should be ">> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits" to avoid the divide.
>> 
>>>               if (qstr) {
>>>                       hinfo.hash_version = DX_HASH_HALF_MD4;
>>>                       hinfo.seed = sbi->s_hash_seed;
>>> @@ -489,6 +501,11 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>               for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
>>>                       g = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
>>>                       get_orlov_stats(sb, g, flex_size, &stats);
>>> +                       /* can't get better group than empty group */
>>> +                       if (max_usable_blocks_per_flex_group == \
>>> +                               stats.free_clusters && \
>> 
>> No need for linefeed escapes.
>> 
>>> +                               inodes_per_flex_group == stats.free_inodes)
>> 
>> Align continued line after '(' from the "if (" line.
>> 
>>> +                                       goto found_flex_bg;
>> 
>> This is indented too much.  It will work properly when you fix the
>> previous line.
>> 
>>>                       if (!stats.free_inodes)
>>>                               continue;
>>>                       if (stats.used_dirs >= best_ndir)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.1
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Lokesh
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:34:51AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>>> On Dec 26, 2015, at 01:41, Lokesh Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From 5199982d29ff291b181c25af63a22d6f2d6d3f7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
>>>>> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:19:36 +0530
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v3] ext4: optimizing group search for inode allocation
>>>>> 
>>>>> Added a check at the start of group search loop to
>>>>> avoid looping unecessarily in case of empty group.
>>>>> This also allow group search to jump directly to
>>>>> "found_flex_bg" with "stats" and "group" already set,
>>>>> so there is no need to go through the extra steps of
>>>>> setting "best_desc" and "best_group" and then break
>>>>> out of the loop just to set "stats" and "group" again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/ext4/ialloc.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>> index 1b8024d..16f94db 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>> @@ -473,10 +473,14 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>>>      ndirs = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
>>>>> 
>>>>>      if (S_ISDIR(mode) &&
>>>>> -           ((parent == d_inode(sb->s_root)) ||
>>>>> -            (ext4_test_inode_flag(parent, EXT4_INODE_TOPDIR)))) {
>>>>> +               ((parent == d_inode(sb->s_root)) ||
>>>>> +               (ext4_test_inode_flag(parent, EXT4_INODE_TOPDIR)))) {
>>>> 
>>>> I don't understand why you are changing the indentation here?
>>>> 
>>>>> +               unsigned int inodes_per_flex_group;
>>>>> +               unsigned long int clusters_per_flex_group;
>>>>>              int best_ndir = inodes_per_group;
>>>>>              int ret = -1;
>>>>> +               inodes_per_flex_group = inodes_per_group * flex_size;
>>>>> +               clusters_per_flex_group = sbi->s_clusters_per_group * flex_size;
>>>> 
>>>> Have you actually tested if this code works?  When I was looking at this
>>>> code I was accidentally looking at the ext2 version, which only deals with
>>>> individual groups, and not flex groups.  I don't think that a flex group
>>>> can actually be completely empty, since it will always contain at least
>>>> an inode table and some bitmaps.
>>>> 
>>>> This calculation needs to take this into account or it will just be
>>>> overhead and not an optimization. Something like:
>>>> 
>>>>               /* account for inode table and allocation bitmaps */
>>>>               clusters_per_flex_group = sbi->s_clusters_per_group * flex_size -
>>>>                       ((inodes_per_flex_group * EXT4_INODE_SIZE(sb) +
>>>>                         (flex_size << sb->s_blocksize_bits) * 2 ) >>
>>>>                       EXT4_SB(sb)->s_cluster_bits;
>>>> 
>>>> It would be worthwhile to print this out and verify that there are actually
>>>> groups with this many free blocks in a newly formatted filesystem.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>> 
>>>>>              if (qstr) {
>>>>>                      hinfo.hash_version = DX_HASH_HALF_MD4;
>>>>> @@ -489,6 +493,10 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>>>              for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
>>>>>                      g = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
>>>>>                      get_orlov_stats(sb, g, flex_size, &stats);
>>>>> +                       /* the group can't get any better than empty */
>>>>> +                       if (inodes_per_flex_group == stats.free_inodes &&
>>>>> +                               clusters_per_flex_group == stats.free_clusters)
>>>>> +                               goto found_flex_bg;
>>>>>                      if (!stats.free_inodes)
>>>>>                              continue;
>>>>>                      if (stats.used_dirs >= best_ndir)
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:27:37AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:32 PM, lokesh jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From 9e09fef78b2fa552c883bf8124af873abfde0805 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>>> From: Lokesh Nagappa Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...gate.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In the patch summary there is a typo - s/serch/search/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, it appears your email client has mangled the whitespace in the
>>>>>> patch.  Please use "git send-email" to send your patch to the list:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> git send-email --to tytso@....edu --cc linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org HEAD~1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> so that it arrives intact.  You probably need to set it up in ~/.gitconfig:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [sendemail]
>>>>>>      confirm = compose
>>>>>>      smtpdomain = {your client hostname}
>>>>>>      smtpserver = {your SMTP server hostname}
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Added a check at the start of group search loop to
>>>>>>> avoid looping unecessarily in case of empty group.
>>>>>>> This also allow group search to jump directly to
>>>>>>> "found_flex_bg" with "stats" and "group" already set,
>>>>>>> so there is no need to go through the extra steps of
>>>>>>> setting "best_desc" and "best_group" and then break
>>>>>>> out of the loop just to set "stats" and "group" again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh N Jaliminche <lokesh.jaliminche@...il.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> fs/ext4/ialloc.c |    8 ++++++++
>>>>>>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>>>> index 1b8024d..588bf8e 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
>>>>>>> @@ -446,6 +446,8 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block
>>>>>>> *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>>>>> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>>>>>>> ext4_group_t real_ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
>>>>>>> int inodes_per_group = EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb);
>>>>>>> + unsigned int inodes_per_flex_group;
>>>>>>> + long unsigned int blocks_per_clustre;
>>>>>>> unsigned int freei, avefreei, grp_free;
>>>>>>> ext4_fsblk_t freeb, avefreec;
>>>>>>> unsigned int ndirs;
>>>>>>> @@ -470,6 +472,8 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block
>>>>>>> *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>>>>> percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeclusters_counter));
>>>>>>> avefreec = freeb;
>>>>>>> do_div(avefreec, ngroups);
>>>>>>> + inodes_per_flex_group = inodes_per_group * flex_size;
>>>>>>> + blocks_per_clustre = sbi->s_blocks_per_group * flex_size;
>>>>>>> ndirs = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> if (S_ISDIR(mode) &&
>>>>>>> @@ -489,6 +493,10 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super_block
>>>>>>> *sb, struct inode *parent,
>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < ngroups; i++) {
>>>>>>> g = (parent_group + i) % ngroups;
>>>>>>> get_orlov_stats(sb, g, flex_size, &stats);
>>>>>>> + /* the group can't get any better than empty */
>>>>>>> + if (inodes_per_flex_group == stats.free_inodes &&
>>>>>>> + blocks_per_clustre == stats.free_clusters)
>>>>>>> + goto found_flex_bg;
>>>>>>> if (!stats.free_inodes)
>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>> if (stats.used_dirs >= best_ndir)
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 1.7.1
>>>>>>> <0001-EXT4-optimizing-group-serch-for-inode-allocation.patch>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> <0001-ext4-optimizing-group-serch-for-inode-allocation.patch>
>>> <0001-ext4-optimizing-group-serch-for-inode-allocation.patch>
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers, Andreas
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> <0001-ext4-optimizing-group-serch-for-inode-allocation.patch>


Cheers, Andreas






Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ