[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhHMCBaP2b6pmw8ocKc_3degNZ1jd+aypzM2b7DLZve8PB_mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:49:29 -0500
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Li Xi <pkuelelixi@...il.com>,
"open list:OVERLAYFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST F..." <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
adilger@...ger.ca, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, hch@...radead.org,
dmonakhov@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: XFS_IOC_FS[SG]SETXATTR to FS_IOC_FS[SG]ETXATTR promotion
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> So on my Debain system, I don't update linux-libc-dev when I install a
> new upstream kernel built using "make deb-pkg". I'll still a new
> version of the linux-image-*.deb file, and maybe a newer version of
> linux-firmware-*.dev, but I don't bother installing the
> linux-headers-*.deb file (since I don't compile external kernel
> modules), and I don't bother installing linux-libc-dev-*.deb (because
> of situations like this, where the userspace include files need ot be
> updated in sync, and this should be the distribution's problem to
> handle).
I am using a debian system and built the kernel using
"make bindeb-pkg". This generated the following debs:
linux-firmware-image-4.5.0-rc1+_4.5.0-rc1+-2_powerpc.deb
linux-image-4.5.0-rc1+_4.5.0-rc1+-2_powerpc.deb
linux-headers-4.5.0-rc1+_4.5.0-rc1+-2_powerpc.deb
linux-libc-dev_4.5.0-rc1+-2_powerpc.deb
which I installed as I usually do to test new system calls or run other tests.
I'll try to update the uapi header files manually and see how it goes...
Thanks!
--
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists