lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454757826.27087.300.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 06 Feb 2016 11:23:46 +0000
From:	Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: xattr corruption issue on ext2fs generated filesystems

I'm using the -d option of mke2fs to construct a filesystem, I'm seeing
that some xattrs are being corrupted. The filesystem builds with no
errors but when mounted by the kernel, I see errors like "security.ima:
No such attribute". The strace from such a failure is:

mmap(NULL, 26258, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x7fdb36a8c000
close(3)                    = 0
getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, {rlim_cur=1024, rlim_max=64*1024}) = 0
lstat("mnt/foobar", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1, ...}) = 0
listxattr("mnt/foobar", NULL, 0) = 30
listxattr("mnt/foobar", "security.SMACK64\0security.ima\0", 256) = 30
getxattr("mnt/foobar", "security.SMACK64", 0x0, 0) = 1
getxattr("mnt/foobar", "security.SMACK64", "_", 256) = 1
fstat(1, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=makedev(136, 13), ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fdb36a8b000
write(1, "# file: mnt/foobar\n", 19# file: mnt/foobar) = 19
write(1, "security.SMACK64=\"_\"\n", 21security.SMACK64="_") = 21
getxattr("mnt/foobar", "security.ima", 0x0, 0) = -1 ENODATA (No data available)
write(2, "mnt/foobar: ", 12mnt/foobar: ) = 12
write(2, "security.ima: No such attribute\n", 32security.ima: No such attribute) = 32= 32

so the attribute is there but the kernel gives ENODATA when trying
to read it.

http://www.nongnu.org/ext2-doc/ext2.html#CONTRIB-EXTENDED-ATTRIBUTES co
ntains the small snippet that " The entry descriptors are sorted by
attribute name, so that two extended attribute blocks can be compared
efficiently. ". It doesn't specify what kind of sort.

Looking at ext2fs, there is some sorting code through the qsort call
using attr_compare() but it doesn't match what the kernel is doing in
 ext4_xattr_find_entry().

I put together this quick patch to test my theory that this causing the
problem:

Index: git/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
===================================================================
--- git.orig/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
+++ git/lib/ext2fs/ext_attr.c
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static struct ea_name_index ea_names[] =
 static int attr_compare(const void *a, const void *b)
 {
 	const struct ext2_xattr *xa = a, *xb = b;
+	size_t len;
 
 	if (xa->name == NULL)
 		return +1;
@@ -267,7 +268,11 @@ static int attr_compare(const void *a, c
 		return -1;
 	else if (!strcmp(xb->name, "system.data"))
 		return +1;
-	return 0;
+	len = strlen(xa->name) - strlen(xb->name);
+	if (len)
+		return len;
+
+	return strcmp(xa->name, xb->name);
 }
 
 static const char *find_ea_prefix(int index)

This makes my filesystems work.

Is this a bug? I'm assuming ext2fs shouldn't generate filesystems the
kernel can't read? Is the above the correct fix?

Cheers,

Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ