[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jOAKeTXt0EvZzfxzqcaf+ZWrtsFeN2JFP_sf1HcTpVOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:19:29 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks()
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> dax_clear_blocks() needs a valid struct block_device and previously it was
> using inode->i_sb->s_bdev in all cases. This is correct for normal inodes
> on mounted ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw
> block devices and for XFS real-time devices.
>
> Instead, have the caller pass in a struct block_device pointer which it
> knows to be correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 4 ++--
> fs/ext2/inode.c | 5 +++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/dax.h | 3 ++-
> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 227974a..4592241 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ struct page *read_dax_sector(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t n)
> * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow GFP_NOFS
> * semantics for all operations.
> */
> -int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long _size)
> +int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct block_device *bdev,
> + sector_t block, long _size)
Since this is a bdev relative routine we should also resolve the
sector, i.e. the signature should drop the inode:
int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, long _size)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists