lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1455206338-2869-1-git-send-email-a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:58:58 -0500
From:	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: ioctl: fix erroneous return value

The ext4_ioctl_setflags() function which is used in the ioctls
EXT4_IOC_SETFLAGS and EXT4_IOC_FSSETXATTR may return the positive value
EPERM instead of -EPERM in case of error. This bug was introduced by a
recent commit 9b7365fc.

The following program can be used to illustrate the wrong behavior:

    #include <sys/types.h>
    #include <sys/ioctl.h>
    #include <sys/stat.h>
    #include <fcntl.h>
    #include <err.h>

    #define FS_IOC_GETFLAGS _IOR('f', 1, long)
    #define FS_IOC_SETFLAGS _IOW('f', 2, long)
    #define FS_IMMUTABLE_FL 0x00000010

    int main(void)
    {
        int fd;
        long flags;

        fd = open("file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0600);
        if (fd < 0)
            err(1, "open");

        if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_GETFLAGS, &flags) < 0)
            err(1, "ioctl: FS_IOC_GETFLAGS");

        flags |= FS_IMMUTABLE_FL;

        if (ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, &flags) < 0)
            err(1, "ioctl: FS_IOC_SETFLAGS");

        warnx("ioctl returned no error");

        return 0;
    }

Running it gives the following result:

    $ strace -e ioctl ./test
    ioctl(3, FS_IOC_GETFLAGS, 0x7ffdbd8bfd38) = 0
    ioctl(3, FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, 0x7ffdbd8bfd38) = 1
    test: ioctl returned no error
    +++ exited with 0 +++

Running the program on a kernel with the bug fixed gives the proper result:

    $ strace -e ioctl ./test
    ioctl(3, FS_IOC_GETFLAGS, 0x7ffdd2768258) = 0
    ioctl(3, FS_IOC_SETFLAGS, 0x7ffdd2768258) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
    test: ioctl: FS_IOC_SETFLAGS: Operation not permitted
    +++ exited with 1 +++

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>
---
 fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index 0f6c369..a99b010 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int ext4_ioctl_setflags(struct inode *inode,
 {
 	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
 	handle_t *handle = NULL;
-	int err = EPERM, migrate = 0;
+	int err = -EPERM, migrate = 0;
 	struct ext4_iloc iloc;
 	unsigned int oldflags, mask, i;
 	unsigned int jflag;
-- 
2.6.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ