lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160217213738.GJ14140@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:37:38 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] dax: give DAX clearing code correct bdev

On Tue 16-02-16 20:34:17, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> dax_clear_blocks() needs a valid struct block_device and previously it was
> using inode->i_sb->s_bdev in all cases.  This is correct for normal inodes
> on mounted ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw
> block devices and for XFS real-time devices.
> 
> Instead, rename dax_clear_blocks() to dax_clear_sectors(), and change its
> arguments to take a bdev and a sector instead of an inode and a block.
> This better reflects what the function does, and it allows the filesystem
> and raw block device code to pass in an appropriate struct block_device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

The patch looks good to me. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/dax.c               | 9 ++++-----
>  fs/ext2/inode.c        | 6 ++++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c      | 2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h      | 1 +
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 3 ++-
>  include/linux/dax.h    | 2 +-
>  6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index fc2e314..9a173dd 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -79,15 +79,14 @@ struct page *read_dax_sector(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t n)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * dax_clear_blocks() is called from within transaction context from XFS,
> + * dax_clear_sectors() is called from within transaction context from XFS,
>   * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow GFP_NOFS
>   * semantics for all operations.
>   */
> -int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long _size)
> +int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t _sector, long _size)
>  {
> -	struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
>  	struct blk_dax_ctl dax = {
> -		.sector = block << (inode->i_blkbits - 9),
> +		.sector = _sector,
>  		.size = _size,
>  	};
>  
> @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long _size)
>  	wmb_pmem();
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_clear_blocks);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_clear_sectors);
>  
>  /* the clear_pmem() calls are ordered by a wmb_pmem() in the caller */
>  static void dax_new_buf(void __pmem *addr, unsigned size, unsigned first,
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index 27e2cdd..4467cbd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -737,8 +737,10 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
>  		 * so that it's not found by another thread before it's
>  		 * initialised
>  		 */
> -		err = dax_clear_blocks(inode, le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key),
> -						1 << inode->i_blkbits);
> +		err = dax_clear_sectors(inode->i_sb->s_bdev,
> +				le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key) <<
> +				(inode->i_blkbits - 9),
> +				1 << inode->i_blkbits);
>  		if (err) {
>  			mutex_unlock(&ei->truncate_mutex);
>  			goto cleanup;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 379c089..fc20518 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ xfs_count_page_state(
>  	} while ((bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
>  }
>  
> -STATIC struct block_device *
> +struct block_device *
>  xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(
>  	struct inode		*inode)
>  {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> index f6ffc9a..a4343c6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h
> @@ -62,5 +62,6 @@ int	xfs_get_blocks_dax_fault(struct inode *inode, sector_t offset,
>  			         struct buffer_head *map_bh, int create);
>  
>  extern void xfs_count_page_state(struct page *, int *, int *);
> +extern struct block_device *xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(struct inode *);
>  
>  #endif /* __XFS_AOPS_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index 45ec9e4..6c87601 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ xfs_zero_extent(
>  	ssize_t		size = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, count_fsb);
>  
>  	if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip)))
> -		return dax_clear_blocks(VFS_I(ip), block, size);
> +		return dax_clear_sectors(xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(VFS_I(ip)),
> +				sector, size);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * let the block layer decide on the fastest method of
> diff --git a/include/linux/dax.h b/include/linux/dax.h
> index 818e450..7b6bced 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dax.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dax.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>  
>  ssize_t dax_do_io(struct kiocb *, struct inode *, struct iov_iter *, loff_t,
>  		  get_block_t, dio_iodone_t, int flags);
> -int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *, sector_t block, long size);
> +int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t _sector, long _size);
>  int dax_zero_page_range(struct inode *, loff_t from, unsigned len, get_block_t);
>  int dax_truncate_page(struct inode *, loff_t from, get_block_t);
>  int dax_fault(struct vm_area_struct *, struct vm_fault *, get_block_t,
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ