[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160218003929.GT14668@dastard>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:39:29 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, lkp@...org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [lkp] [direct] 187372a3b9: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3999 at
fs/ext4/inode.c:3315 ext4_direct_IO+0x56d/0x5b0()
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 08:38:10AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> commit 187372a3b9faff68ed61c291d0135e6739e0dbdf ("direct-io: always call ->end_io if non-NULL")
>
>
> run fstests generic/299 at 2016-02-16 06:10:03
> EXT4-fs (sda8): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: acl,user_xattr
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3999 at fs/ext4/inode.c:3315 ext4_direct_IO+0x56d/0x5b0()
.....
> [<ffffffff81422e52>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x69
> [<ffffffff8107a476>] warn_slowpath_common+0x86/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8107a56a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [<ffffffff81282a2d>] ext4_direct_IO+0x56d/0x5b0
> [<ffffffff811719ea>] generic_file_direct_write+0xaa/0x170
> [<ffffffff81171b70>] __generic_file_write_iter+0xc0/0x1f0
> [<ffffffff8127d201>] ext4_file_write_iter+0x141/0x430
> [<ffffffff81242436>] aio_run_iocb+0x226/0x290
> [<ffffffff8124353d>] do_io_submit+0x29d/0x530
> [<ffffffff812437e0>] SyS_io_submit+0x10/0x20
> [<ffffffff818e012e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71
3309 /*
3310 * When no IO was submitted ext4_end_io_dio() was not
3311 * called so we have to put iocb's reference.
3312 */
3313 if (ret <= 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED && iocb->private) {
3314 WARN_ON(iocb->private != io_end);
3315 >>>>>>>> WARN_ON(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN);
3316 ext4_put_io_end(io_end);
3317 iocb->private = NULL;
3318 }
Pre-existing ext4 issue. It assumes that unwritten extent conversion
occurs even on IO submission error. i.e. when we avoid the stale
data exposure bug that the bisect-blamed commit fixed, ext4 warns
that it failed to expose stale data....
I'd just remove that warning, but I have no idea how that impacts on
the rest of ext4's end IO handling. Christoph, Ted, the ball is in
your court for this one.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists