[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160306024100.GG10297@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2016 21:41:00 -0500
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] filefrag: accommodate holes when calculating
expected values
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 02:38:04PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Currently, filefrag's "expected physical block" column expects extent
> records to be physically adjacent regardless of the amount of logical
> block space between the two records. This means that if we punch a
> hole in a file, we get reports like this:
>
> ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
> 4: 4096.. 8343: 57376.. 61623: 4248:
> 5: 8345.. 10313: 61625.. 63593: 1969: 61624:
>
> Notice how it expects 8345 to map to 61624, and scores this against
> the fragmentation of the file. Flagging this as "unexpected" is
> incorrect because the gap in the logical mapping is exactly the same
> size as the gap in the physical extents.
>
> Furthermore, this particular mapping leaves the door open to the
> optimal mapping -- if a write to block 8344 causes it to be mapped to
> 61624, the entire range 4096-10313 can be mapped with a single extent.
> Until that happens, there's no way to combine extents 4 and 5 because
> of the gap in the logical mapping at block 8344.
>
> Therefore, tweak the extent report to account for holes.
>
> v2: Make it work for extents crossing FIEMAP calls, and clean up the
> FIBMAP version to report correct expected values.
>
> v3: Don't count physically but not logically contiguous extents
> in the fragmentation summary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists