lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160321052109.GE3331@thunk.org>
Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 01:21:09 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Abraham Choi <north.choi@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about JBD2 transactions

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:23:55AM +0000, Abraham Choi wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Frist of all, thank you for Ext4's developer.
> 
> I have encounterd a crash problem of ext4 file system on Kernel 3.18.20 
> with mounting 
> rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,relatime,discard,noauto_da_alloc,data=ordered 0 0.
> [   22.361511] EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:757: 
> group 0, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 21208 vs 21219 free 
> clusters
> I think, the reason is that recovered transactions has not recovered over 
> 39809 during booting.
> Booting N-2
> 	[   16.416979] (jbd2_journal_recover, 279): JBD2: recovery, exit 
> status 0, recovered transactions 39665 to 39728
> 	Last commit_sequence=39796
> Booting N-1
> 	[   16.626582] (jbd2_journal_recover, 279): JBD2: recovery, exit 
> status 0, recovered transactions 39730 to 39797
> 	Last commit_sequence=39866
> Booting N
> 	[   14.118542] (jbd2_journal_recover, 279): JBD2: recovery, exit 
> status 0, recovered transactions 39799 to 39809
> 	
> The root casue will be explained the more detail in the follwing.
> Jounral Blocks
> ... <Descriptor block #39808> <Data blocks> <Commit block #39808> 
> <All zero block> <Descriptor block #39809> <Data blocks> <Commit block 
> #39809> ... 
> I'm wondering that journal has all zero data, only 1 block.
> How it can be possible?
> Any tips or help would be appreciated.

Can you reproduce this?  And how did you dump out the journal blocks?
There shouldn't be an all zero block after the commit block, unless
that really was the last transaction.

				- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ