[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160324121732.GE4025@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:17:32 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: "HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@...bosch.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"Li, Michael" <huayil@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: ext4 out of order when use cfq scheduler
On Thu 24-03-16 10:16:05, HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN) wrote:
> >
> > OK, I have something - Huang, can you check whether the attached patches also
> > fix your data exposure issues please? The first patch is the original fix, patch two
> > is a cleanup, patches 3 and 4 implement the speedup suggested by Ted. Patches
> > are only lightly tested so far. I'll run more comprehensive tests later and in
> > particular I want to check whether the additional complexity actually brings us
> > some advantage at least for workloads which redirty pages in addition to writing
> > some new ones using delayed allocation.
> >
>
> Test done.
> Both targets(kernel 3.10.63) PASS the power loss test with 10,000 cycles. Test with io-scheduler CFQ.
Thanks for testing! I'll submit those patches once I verify there is some
performance gain in only waiting...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists