lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:20:39 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
Cc:	"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
	"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Verma, Vishal L
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.c
>> om> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
>> >
>> > dax_clear_sectors() cannot handle poisoned blocks.  These must be
>> > zeroed using the BIO interface instead.  Convert ext2 and XFS to
>> > use
>> > only sb_issue_zerout().
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
>> > [vishal: Also remove the dax_clear_sectors function entirely]
>> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
>> > ---
>> >  fs/dax.c               | 32 --------------------------------
>> >  fs/ext2/inode.c        |  7 +++----
>> >  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c |  9 ---------
>> >  include/linux/dax.h    |  1 -
>> >  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
>> > index bb7e9f8..a30481e 100644
>> > --- a/fs/dax.c
>> > +++ b/fs/dax.c
>> > @@ -78,38 +78,6 @@ struct page *read_dax_sector(struct block_device
>> > *bdev, sector_t n)
>> >         return page;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -/*
>> > - * dax_clear_sectors() is called from within transaction context
>> > from XFS,
>> > - * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow
>> > GFP_NOFS
>> > - * semantics for all operations.
>> > - */
>> > -int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t _sector,
>> > long _size)
>> > -{
>> > -       struct blk_dax_ctl dax = {
>> > -               .sector = _sector,
>> > -               .size = _size,
>> > -       };
>> > -
>> > -       might_sleep();
>> > -       do {
>> > -               long count, sz;
>> > -
>> > -               count = dax_map_atomic(bdev, &dax);
>> > -               if (count < 0)
>> > -                       return count;
>> > -               sz = min_t(long, count, SZ_128K);
>> > -               clear_pmem(dax.addr, sz);
>> > -               dax.size -= sz;
>> > -               dax.sector += sz / 512;
>> > -               dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
>> > -               cond_resched();
>> > -       } while (dax.size);
>> > -
>> > -       wmb_pmem();
>> > -       return 0;
>> > -}
>> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_clear_sectors);
>> What about the other unwritten extent conversions in the dax path?
>> Shouldn't those be converted to block-layer zero-outs as well?
>
> Could you point me to where these might be? I thought once we've
> converted all the zeroout type callers (by removing dax_clear_sectors),
> and fixed up dax_do_io to try a driver fallback, we've handled all the
> media error cases in dax..

grep for usages of clear_pmem()... which I was hoping to eliminate
after this change to push zeroing down to the driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ