linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160415081757.GK10643@dastard>
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:17:57 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
Cc:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if
 inode_dio_begin() called

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:21:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 11:16 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:12:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >>When performing direct I/O, the current ext4 code does
> >>not pass in the DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag to dax_do_io() or
> >>__blockdev_direct_IO() when inode_dio_begin() has, in fact, been
> >>called. This causes dax_do_io()/__blockdev_direct_IO() to invoke
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() internally.  This doubling of
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() calls are wasteful.
> >>
> >>This patch removes the extra internal inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end()
> >>calls when those calls are being issued by the caller directly. For
> >>really fast storage systems like NVDIMM, the removal of the extra
> >>inode_dio_begin()/inode_dio_end() can give a meaningful boost to
> >>I/O performance.
> >Doesn't this break truncate IO serialisation?
> >
> >i.e. it appears to me that the ext4 use of inode_dio_begin()/
> >inode_dio_end() does not cover AIO, where the IO is still in flight
> >when submission returns. i.e. the inode_dio_end() call
> >needs to be in IO completion, not in the submitter context. The only
> >reason it doesn't break right now is that the duplicate accounting
> >in the DIO code is correct w.r.t. AIO. Hence bypassing the DIO
> >accounting will cause AIO writes to race with truncate.
> >
> >Same AIO vs truncate problem occurs with the indirect read case you
> >modified to skip the direct IO layer accounting.
> 
> I don't quite understand how the duplicate accounting is correct wrt
> AIO. Both the direct and indirect paths are something like:
> 
>     inode_dio_begin()
>     ...
>         inode_dio_begin()
>         ...
>         inode_dio_end()
>     ...
>     inode_dio_end()

With AIO:

	inode_dio_begin()
	...
		inode_dio_begin()
		<submit IO, no wait>
	...
	inode_dio_end()
<ext4 returns to userspace with AIO+DIO in progress>

<some time later DIO completes>
	        dio_complete
		  inode_dio_end()

IOWs, the ext4 accounting is broken w.r.t. AIO, where IO submission
does not wait for IO completion before returning.

> What the patch does is to eliminate the innermost
> inode_dio_begin/end pair.

Yes, and with that change inode_dio_wait() no longer waits for
AIO+DIO writes on ext4, hence breaking truncate IO barrier
requirements of inode_dio_wait().

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html