linux-ext4 - [PATCH v5 1/2] dax: Don't touch i_dio_count in dax_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1461947276-25988-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:27:55 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
To:	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] dax: Don't touch i_dio_count in dax_do_io()

The purpose of the i_dio_count is to protect against truncation while
the I/O operation is in progress. As dax_do_io() only does synchronous
I/O, the locking performed by the caller or within dax_do_io() for
read should be enough to protect it against truncation. There is no
need to touch the i_dio_count.

Eliminating two atomic operations can sometimes give a noticeable
improvement in I/O performance as NVDIMM is much faster than other
disk devices.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
---
 fs/dax.c |   14 ++++++--------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 90322eb..1b4b500 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -253,8 +253,12 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
  * If @flags has DIO_LOCKING set, we assume that the i_mutex is held by the
  * caller for writes.  For reads, we take and release the i_mutex ourselves.
  * If DIO_LOCKING is not set, the filesystem takes care of its own locking.
- * As with do_blockdev_direct_IO(), we increment i_dio_count while the I/O
- * is in progress.
+ *
+ * The do_blockdev_direct_IO() function increment i_dio_count while the I/O
+ * is in progress. However, the dax_do_io() always does synchronous I/O. The
+ * locking done by the caller or within dax_do_io() for read (DIO_LOCKING)
+ * should be enough to protect against concurrent truncation. We don't really
+ * need to touch i_dio_count here.
  */
 ssize_t dax_do_io(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 		  struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t pos, get_block_t get_block,
@@ -277,10 +281,6 @@ ssize_t dax_do_io(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Protects against truncate */
-	if (!(flags & DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT))
-		inode_dio_begin(inode);
-
 	retval = dax_io(inode, iter, pos, end, get_block, &bh);
 
 	if ((flags & DIO_LOCKING) && iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ)
@@ -294,8 +294,6 @@ ssize_t dax_do_io(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 			retval = err;
 	}
 
-	if (!(flags & DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT))
-		inode_dio_end(inode);
  out:
 	return retval;
 }
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html