linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <x49a8k5aen2.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 May 2016 13:58:57 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
	philipp.reisner@...bit.com, lars.ellenberg@...bit.com,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	osd-dev@...n-osd.org, xfs@....sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/42] v7: separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs

Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com> writes:

> On 05/03/2016 03:44 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Hi, Mike,
>> 
>> That git tree doesn't seem to exist.  I did manage to apply your patch
>> set on top of next-20160415, though.
>> 
>> So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems
>
> I normally run xfstests and run it on my daily workstation and laptop. I
> did not do this for every FS this time and hit a regression.
>
> What FS were you using?

I'm using xfs, scsi disk, no blk-mq, no dm.

>> - git clone fails
>> - yum segfaults
>
> In v7/v6, I missed a new submit_bio call, so I hit issues like the two
> above. I have this fixed in the next version.

OK, does this mean you're posting another version, or you already did
and I somehow missed it?

>> - many blktrace/blkparse issues, including incorrect cpu recorded in
>>   traces, null task names, and blkparse outputting nothing for a trace
>>   file several gigabytes in size.
>
> I will double check for these issues.

Thanks.  I'll stop digging for now, then.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html